Manual handling relates to the movements of loads by human effort, as opposed to the use of mechanical handling equipment such as lift trucks, etc.
It is estimated that in the order of one third of all reported workplace accidents arise from some form of manual handling activity. The associated risks include:
Employers’ Duties
Under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (as amended), a clear hierarchy is established:
The employer has a duty to avoid the risk of injury to employees arising from manual handling operations, where this is reasonably practicable. Where this is not reasonably practicable, the employer must assess the risks arising from the manual handling operation and reduce this risk down to as low a level as is reasonably practicable.
Consideration must also be given to the:
Reducing the risk
Call LRB Consulting
on
01509 550023
Avoiding (the need for) manual handling
Consideration should be given to automation or mechanisation of the handling operation. This may involve the use of:
The effectiveness of automation is greater if it is incorporated into the original design for the process.
Potential solutions include: Caveat: although avoiding manual handling is important, it is of little benefit if the resultant risks (such as from fork lift truck operation) are greater than the original risks from manual handling.
Mechanical assistance
With the use of appropriate mechanical assistance, some manual handling is retained, but that the bodily forces are applied more efficiently, hence reducing the risk of injury. Examples include (but are not limited to):
Changing the task and/or premises layout
Improvements in the flow and storage of products and materials as well as the design of the premises can reduce the risks to employees and may also lead to improvements in efficiency and productivity.
With certain heavy loads, the risks associated with the task can be reduced by splitting the load up into smaller, lighter loads (e.g. boxed components may be packed in 10 Kg load rather than 20 Kg loads, etc.).
Where heavy items must be moved in and out of storage, the optimum position for storage of such loads is around waist height. Storage much above or below this height should be reserved for loads that are lighter, more easily handled, or are handled infrequently. Designing the working area such that the distances that materials need to be carried are reduced will improve productivity as well as reducing the risks of injury. Similarly, reducing or eliminating the need to open doors, etc. while carrying loads will make similar improvements.
Where the task requires poor handling techniques and posture
Where the task requires poor handling techniques or poor posture to be adopted, efforts must be made to reduce the negative effects of these.
The effects of the distance and position of the load from the body, twisting of the trunk and poor posture can be mitigated through changing the task, altering the lay out of the task and effective use of the body.
Tasks that are designed to permit the load to be held closer to the body reduce risks of injury. The approach, grasping and placing of the load should be carefully controlled by:
Where the task involves greater distances of lifting, lowering and travel
The stresses on the (lower) back during:
as well as those from having to travel long distances with a load, can be reduced through changes to the task and to the use of the body.
The following measures could be considered:
Where the task involves excessive effort, fixed posture and insufficient rest and recovery
Building in variation of the work routine is beneficial in reducing the stresses and strains on backs of those involved in manual handling. Consideration should be given to:
Call LRB Consulting
on
01509 550023
Health & Safety Risk Assessment are a key element in an effective Health & Safety Strategy - not only that, they are a legal requirement!
Are you doing the right ones, correctly?